EPA’s TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting program page reiterates the one-time reporting submission window for most entities (Apr 13, 2026 through Oct 13, 2026) and the extended deadline for certain small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importers (until Apr 13, 2027). Compliance teams should use the posted window to finalize internal data collection for PFAS manufactured/imported during the rule’s covered period, confirm eligibility for any extended deadline category, and ensure recordkeeping processes align with EPA’s stated requirements.
EPA published documentation describing common assumptions (including default values) used in assessing new chemicals under TSCA, intended to increase transparency and improve the efficiency of the new chemicals review process. For PMN/SNUN submitters, this is actionable for aligning submissions with EPA’s stated assumptions to reduce follow-up information requests and better anticipate EPA’s exposure and hazard assessment approaches.
EPA proposed to extend the reporting deadline for the TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting rule covering 16 chemical substances. Compliance teams responsible for submitting unpublished health and safety studies and related information under TSCA 8(d) should review the proposed extension and adjust internal data-collection and submission timelines accordingly.
EPA proposed to extend the reporting deadline by one year to May 21, 2027 for the one-time TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rule submissions. If finalized, manufacturers (including importers) and processors subject to the rule would have additional time to compile and submit required unpublished health and safety studies and related information to EPA, affecting internal data-collection, legal review, and submission timelines.
Both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate have released discussion drafts proposing to reauthorize TSCA fees (which expire September 30, 2026) and revise the 2016 Lautenberg amendments as they approach their ten-year mark. The proposals would affect fee structures for chemical manufacturers and processors under TSCA sections 4, 5, and 6 activities. Stakeholders should monitor legislative developments as reauthorization will impact compliance costs and potentially program procedures.
EPA announced a proposal to extend certain compliance dates in the final TSCA Section 6 risk management rules for perchloroethylene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC) to improve practical implementation (including Workplace Chemical Protection Program-related timelines). Until any amendments are finalized, currently-effective compliance dates remain in effect. EPA is seeking public comment via docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2026-0992 on Regulations.gov.
EPA announced a proposal to extend certain compliance dates in the final TSCA §6 risk management rules for perchloroethylene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC), stating it is working on revisions intended to make the rules more practical and implementable. Until EPA completes rulemaking, existing compliance dates remain in effect. Compliance teams should monitor the Federal Register publication and the associated comment process once opened.
EPA released a proposal to extend certain compliance dates in the final TSCA Section 6 risk management rules for perchloroethylene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC) while EPA works on further rule revisions. EPA states it is not revisiting the underlying TSCA unreasonable risk determinations and that protections are not being weakened. EPA indicates a 30-day public comment period will run upon Federal Register publication and points stakeholders to the rulemaking docket via Regulations.gov, which compliance teams should monitor for the Federal Register notice, specific extended dates, and applicability details.
EPA issued a proposal to extend certain compliance dates in the final TSCA Section 6 risk management rules for perchloroethylene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC) while EPA works to revise the rules. EPA indicates comments will be accepted upon publication of the Federal Register notice (docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2026-0992). Compliance teams subject to these TSCA Section 6 requirements should track the rulemaking because existing deadlines remain in effect until modified and future compliance dates may shift.
EPA issued an interim final rule under TSCA section 6 risk management for trichloroethylene (TCE) that extends certain compliance dates. The update affects specific TCE prohibitions (including a use as a processing aid in nuclear fuel manufacturing) and extends a prohibition related to disposal of TCE to wastewater, and also adjusts the downstream notification timeline (e.g., allowing a set period after publication of the final rule for notification changes). Compliance teams using or disposing of TCE in these affected scenarios should reassess internal phase-out plans, wastewater/disposal controls, supplier/customer notifications, and any related contract and SDS/labeling workflows to align with the extended timelines and any interim final rule conditions.
EPA’s TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting and recordkeeping webpage reiterates the reporting window for covered manufacturers (including importers) and the separate deadline for small manufacturers that only report as PFAS article importers. Compliance teams should use these dates to finalize internal data collection, supplier outreach, and CDX submission planning for the one-time PFAS reporting rule.
EPA updated its New Chemicals Program page providing publicly available versions of TSCA Section 5 orders addressing significant new uses for certain chemical substances, including PFAS (with confidential business information removed). Compliance teams should use the posted order text to understand the restrictions/conditions tied to these chemicals and ensure that any manufacturing, importing, processing, or use changes are evaluated against Section 5 order obligations and potential SNUN triggers.
EPA refreshed its public statistics for the TSCA New Chemicals Program (Section 5 submissions such as PMNs/SNUNs/MCANs and exemptions), providing updated counts and workload metrics. This is a transparency/program information update rather than a binding rule change, but it may affect compliance planning by indicating review timelines and backlogs.
EPA updated the TSCA New Chemicals Division Reference Library (Section 5 program support) to include additional technical memoranda/guidance used in new chemical risk assessments and decision-making. These materials can affect PMN/SNUN strategy and supporting data expectations (e.g., approaches for assessing environmental hazards of cathode active material new chemical substances and guidance on exposure assumptions/industrial hygiene considerations, plus a decision framework for skin irritation/corrosion hazard identification). Compliance teams submitting or planning TSCA Section 5 notices should review these documents because they may influence EPA’s hazard/exposure assumptions and resulting determinations or required risk management conditions.
EPA announced a proposed rule to revise procedures for conducting TSCA risk evaluations for existing chemicals (the TSCA risk evaluation 'framework rule'). The proposal would change key elements of the risk evaluation process (e.g., how unreasonable risk determinations are made across conditions of use and how certain exposure controls/parameters are handled). Stakeholders should track Federal Register publication and consider submitting comments during the stated comment period once open.
EPA issued a final action extending the postponement (an additional 90 days) of the effectiveness of certain provisions of the TSCA Section 6 trichloroethylene (TCE) risk management rule, specifically affecting conditions imposed on uses with TSCA §6(g) exemptions. The postponement extends the effectiveness date of the affected provisions until May 18, 2026. Compliance teams relying on §6(g) exemptions should reassess timing for meeting any conditions associated with exempted uses and track subsequent EPA actions in the same rulemaking docket.
EPA published a Federal Register rule extending the postponement of effectiveness for certain provisions related to conditions imposed on TSCA §6(g) exemptions in the 2024 TSCA trichloroethylene (TCE) risk management rule. The postponement was extended so that, as of Feb. 17, 2026, the affected provisions are postponed until May 18, 2026. Companies relying on, seeking, or operating under TSCA §6(g) exemptions associated with the TCE rule should adjust compliance planning to the updated timeline and monitor for subsequent changes.
EPA published a final action extending the postponement of effectiveness for certain provisions of the TSCA risk management rule for trichloroethylene (TCE), specifically affecting conditions tied to TSCA section 6(g) exemptions, until May 18, 2026. This changes the timeline for when affected requirements become effective for entities relying on (or managing) exempted uses under the TCE rule. Compliance teams should reassess implementation schedules, contractual obligations, and operational controls tied to the postponed provisions.
EPA proposed amendments to the TSCA Title VI Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products. The proposal would add ISO 12460-2:2024(en) (small-scale chamber method) as an additional quality control test method for measuring formaldehyde emissions and update incorporation-by-reference to current versions of voluntary consensus standards. Compliance teams for composite wood product manufacturers, importers, fabricators, certifiers, and third-party labs should review the proposed test-method/standard updates and submit comments by the stated deadline, as adoption would affect testing, certification, and documentation practices under TSCA Title VI.
EPA issued a proposed rule to amend the Formaldehyde Emission Standards for Composite Wood Products regulations under TSCA Title VI by adding a new quality control test method (ISO 12460-2:2024(en) small-scale chamber method) and making technical updates to incorporated voluntary consensus standards. Compliance teams in the composite wood products supply chain should review the proposed updates to referenced standards/test methods and submit comments within the stated comment period once published in the Federal Register.