All regulatory updates
718 results found
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 adopted to provide technical descriptions for CRA Annex III (important) and Annex IV (critical) product categories
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 (of 28 November 2025) establishes the technical description of the categories of “important” and “critical” products with digital elements under the Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847). For Annex IV ‘critical products’, these technical descriptions are central for determining whether a product’s core functionality falls into an Annex IV category, which in turn drives the applicable conformity assessment route (typically requiring third-party involvement for critical products). Compliance teams should use this implementing regulation when classifying products against Annex IV and aligning technical documentation and conformity assessment planning accordingly.
FDA withdraws proposed rule on standardized asbestos testing methods for talc-containing cosmetic products (MoCRA Section 3505)
FDA published a Federal Register notice withdrawing its proposed rule that would have established standardized testing methods for detecting and identifying asbestos in talc-containing cosmetic products (a MoCRA-related proposal). For compliance teams, this means the previously proposed federal framework for standardized talc/asbestos testing methods is not proceeding as proposed, and companies should monitor for a replacement proposed rule to satisfy MoCRA section 3505. The withdrawal affects regulatory planning for cosmetics quality/testing programs, supplier specifications, and method validation strategies tied to FDA-standardized methods.
EPA announces intent to reconsider the TSCA §8(d) health and safety study reporting rule for 16 chemicals and signals potential action on the May 22, 2026 reporting deadline
EPA posted an update stating it intends to reconsider the December 13, 2024 final TSCA Section 8(d) rule requiring manufacturers/importers of 16 chemicals to submit unpublished health and safety studies. EPA indicates reconsideration topics may include additional exemptions, a reporting threshold, and changes to the lookback period, and notes it anticipates appropriate action regarding the reporting deadline currently identified as May 22, 2026. Compliance teams subject to the 8(d) rule should monitor for subsequent rulemaking that could alter applicability or timing and should plan around the currently stated deadline until changes are finalized.
EPA publishes TSCA New Chemicals Program risk assessment default values used in new chemical reviews
EPA published the key default values used in its risk assessments for new chemicals (TSCA section 5 reviews). This transparency update can affect how submitters and compliance teams prepare PMNs, exemption submissions, and supporting exposure/hazard arguments because EPA’s default assumptions influence risk determinations and potential TSCA orders/SNUR conditions. Companies should align dossiers and internal modeling with EPA’s published defaults and document any proposed alternative values with supporting rationale.
Draft Commission delegated regulation text published (Ares) proposing Annex I listing and UTC limits for LC‑PFCAs (C9–C21), their salts and related compounds
A European Commission draft delegated regulation (Ares document) sets out proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 to list long-chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (LC‑PFCAs; C9–C21), their salts and related compounds in Annex I (Part A), and proposes unintentional trace contaminant (UTC) limit values applicable to substances, mixtures and articles. The draft text also includes derogation/exemption concepts (e.g., isolated intermediate use under strictly controlled conditions; time-limited allowances for certain semiconductor spare-part/repair uses). Compliance teams should use this draft to anticipate likely final EU restriction scope, trace-limit testing needs, and potential supply-chain redesign and customer declarations.
European Commission opens public feedback on draft delegated amendments to list chlorpyrifos, MCCPs and LC‑PFCAs in Annex I (consultations close 19 Dec 2025)
The European Commission opened ‘Have your say’ public feedback consultations on draft delegated regulations to amend Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 (EU POPs Regulation) to add chlorpyrifos, medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs), and long-chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (LC‑PFCAs; C9–C21), their salts and related compounds. The feedback period is indicated as open until 19 Dec 2025. For compliance teams, this signals likely upcoming EU-wide prohibitions and associated unintentional trace contaminant (UTC) limits affecting substances, mixtures and articles; companies potentially impacted should review draft texts and submit technical feedback (e.g., trace contamination feasibility, supply-chain impacts, and any requested derogations).
ECHA recommends four SVHCs for inclusion in the REACH Authorisation List (Annex XIV)
On 18 November 2025, ECHA issued a recommendation to the European Commission to add four SVHCs to the REACH Authorisation List (Annex XIV). While this is not itself a Candidate List change, it is directly SVHC-relevant because Annex XIV inclusion is a subsequent regulatory step for SVHCs that can lead to authorisation requirements for continued use. Compliance teams tracking SVHC lifecycle management should monitor this recommendation and any subsequent Commission action affecting Annex XIV listing. The ECHA recommendations page provides the official listing of recommendation rounds and status information.
ECHA issues 12th recommendation: four SVHCs recommended for inclusion in REACH Annex XIV (Authorisation List)
ECHA issued its final (12th) recommendation to the European Commission to include four Candidate List SVHCs in REACH Annex XIV (Authorisation List). While this is not yet a binding Annex XIV amendment, it is a concrete step in the SVHC-to-authorisation pipeline and signals potential future authorisation obligations (i.e., continued use/placing on the market after any future sunset dates would require authorisation unless exemptions apply). Compliance teams should monitor the Commission’s subsequent Annex XIV amendment process and begin evaluating uses and substitution plans for the recommended substances.
ECHA issued recommendation (18 Nov 2025) to include four Candidate List SVHCs in REACH Annex XIV (Authorisation List)
ECHA published its recommendation dated 18 November 2025 to the European Commission to include four SVHCs in REACH Annex XIV (Authorisation List): Melamine; S-(tricyclo[5.2.1.0²,⁶]deca-3-en-8(or 9)-yl) O-(isopropyl/isobutyl/2-ethylhexyl) O-(isopropyl/isobutyl/2-ethylhexyl) phosphorodithioate; Diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide; and Barium diboron tetraoxide. This is a pre-legislative step that can lead to future authorisation requirements (latest application/sunset dates) if adopted into Annex XIV by the European Commission. Compliance teams should track these substances and evaluate potential substitution/authorisation strategies.
CARB updates FAQ document on California climate disclosure requirements (updated Nov 17, 2025) including SB 261 applicability and definitions
CARB published an updated FAQ document (updated Nov 17, 2025) addressing regulatory development and initial reporting considerations for California’s climate disclosure requirements, including SB 261. The FAQ provides CARB staff interpretations relevant to scoping (e.g., concepts used to evaluate revenue/doing business in California) and clarifies practical questions for entities planning disclosures. Compliance teams should use the FAQ as current CARB interpretive guidance while tracking formal regulations and any post-injunction changes to enforcement posture or timing.
CARB publishes/updates SB 261 Climate Related Financial Risk Report Checklist (updated Nov 17, 2025) describing minimum content expectations and acceptable frameworks
CARB issued an updated SB 261 'Climate Related Financial Risk Report Checklist' (updated Nov 17, 2025) intended to guide covered entities on the contents of climate-related financial risk reports. The checklist is positioned as practical guidance for preparing disclosures and references acceptable reporting frameworks (e.g., TCFD/IFRS S2 or equivalent) and the types of governance/strategy/risk management/metrics information CARB expects entities to address. Compliance teams can use this checklist to structure initial reports and gap-assess existing climate risk disclosures while formal rulemaking and enforcement remain impacted by the injunction.
CARB updates FAQs on California climate disclosure requirements (updated Nov 17, 2025) covering SB 261 implementation topics
CARB updated its FAQ document for the California Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reporting and Climate-Related Financial Risk Disclosure Programs (SB 253/SB 261). The FAQs provide CARB’s implementation interpretations on topics such as program definitions and how CARB is approaching regulatory development and initial reporting expectations relevant to SB 261. Compliance teams should use the FAQs as an official reference for CARB’s current interpretations and planned regulatory approach when designing SB 261 reporting processes and governance.
CARB issues/maintains SB 261 Checklist (updated Nov 17, 2025) clarifying disclosure expectations and acceptable frameworks
CARB published an updated SB 261 climate-related financial risk report checklist (posted Sept. 2, 2025; updated Nov. 17, 2025) intended to guide covered entities on how to prepare SB 261 climate-related financial risk reports. The checklist provides CARB’s implementation guidance on report content and how to handle incomplete/early-stage assessments (e.g., disclosing limitations/assumptions), points to use of industry-specific guidance where applicable, and discusses acceptable frameworks (e.g., TCFD/IFRS-aligned approaches or other qualifying reports as described in the statute). Compliance teams can use this as an official CARB reference for report structure and documentation approach while enforcement is otherwise addressed via separate CARB communications.
EPA updates TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting page confirming reporting window (Apr 13–Oct 13, 2026; small article importers until Apr 13, 2027)
EPA’s TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting and recordkeeping program page reflects the operative one-time reporting submission window for most reporters (April 13, 2026 through October 13, 2026) and the later deadline for small manufacturers that are only reporting as PFAS article importers (until April 13, 2027). Compliance teams should use these dates to plan data gathering, supplier outreach, and internal TSCA reporting workflows; missing the submission window can create TSCA noncompliance risk.
The Villages CDDs publish revised Vendor Insurance Requirements (vendor COI and minimum coverage/endorsement conditions)
The Villages Community Development Districts issued a revised "Vendor Requirements — Insurance Requirements" document (revision date shown as 2025-11-14). The policy sets vendor/contractor insurance conditions for performing work for the districts, including COI submission/approval before work begins and minimum coverage and endorsement requirements (e.g., additional insured/waiver of subrogation conditions) and enforcement levers (e.g., stop-work/withhold payment) if coverage is not maintained. Compliance teams working with this public entity should ensure vendor onboarding and contract requirements match the revised coverage limits and documentation/endorsement expectations in the posted policy.
EPA proposes changes to TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS one-time reporting rule (40 CFR Part 705) to add exemptions and adjust reporting mechanics
EPA issued a proposed rule to amend the TSCA §8(a)(7) one-time PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping rule (40 CFR Part 705). The proposal would narrow/clarify reporting scope via exemptions and technical adjustments (e.g., de minimis concentration concepts, treatment of imported articles, certain byproducts/impurities/R&D/non-isolated intermediates) and may adjust submission mechanics/timeframes. Compliance teams should assess whether their PFAS activities (manufacture, import, processing, articles) would become exempt or otherwise have altered reporting burden if finalized, and consider submitting comments during the open consultation window.
EPA issues update indicating postponement of effectiveness for TSCA TCE risk management rule §6(g) exemption requirements to Feb. 17, 2026
EPA’s status update page for the TSCA risk management rule for trichloroethylene (TCE) states EPA is further postponing the effective date of the TSCA §6(g) exemption requirements in the final TCE rule until Feb. 17, 2026 (as described on the EPA update page, in connection with ongoing litigation/court timing). Compliance teams affected by TCE restrictions should update internal implementation schedules and ensure exemption-related compliance activities align to the postponed effective date and any related EPA communications referenced on the landing/status pages.
AICIS opens public consultation on 2026 revisions to the Industrial Chemicals Categorisation Guidelines (incl. Sept 2026 high-hazard list update preview)
AICIS opened consultation on proposed revisions to the Industrial Chemicals Categorisation Guidelines for 2026, including two specific proposals: (1) add 5 more chemicals to Part 6.5.2 (salts/esters with potential developmental toxicity) and invite suggestions for other chemicals; and (2) replace the current dual definition of “chemical identity holder” with a single new definition. The notice also previews the September 2026 annual update to the “list of chemicals with high hazards for categorisation,” indicating it will add 294 chemicals, update 121 entries, remove 2 chemicals, and correct one CAS number. Compliance teams should monitor and, where relevant, submit comments and begin impact screening for categorisation changes and potential re-categorisation impacts in Sept 2026 once finalised.
EPA proposes amendments to TSCA PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping rule to add exemptions and adjust reporting mechanics
EPA signed and announced a proposed rule to amend the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping requirements (40 CFR Part 705). The proposal would add several exemptions (including imported articles and a de minimis 0.1% concept) and make other practical/technical changes intended to reduce burden while maintaining access to safety data. Compliance teams subject to PFAS reporting should assess whether their operations would fall in/out of scope if finalized and consider submitting comments through the rulemaking docket during the comment period described by EPA (stated as 45 days after Federal Register publication in the research text).
EPA proposes changes to TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping rule (40 CFR Part 705)
EPA issued a proposed rule to amend the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) one-time PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping requirements (40 CFR Part 705). The proposal would introduce multiple scope exemptions and other adjustments intended to make reporting more practical (e.g., exemptions described in the research text include imported articles, de minimis concentrations (0.1%), certain byproducts, impurities, R&D, and non-isolated intermediates), along with technical corrections and changes to submission mechanics. Compliance teams should monitor this rulemaking because, if finalized, it could materially change which entities must report and what information is required for the 2011–2022 lookback period.