All regulatory updates
718 results found
EPA finalizes change delaying the start of TSCA PFAS 8(a)(7) reporting period until 60 days after effective date of forthcoming revision
EPA finalized an update to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS data reporting rule timeline, moving the reporting period start from April 13, 2026 to 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming revision to the PFAS 8(a)(7) rule. This affects entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS in any year 2011–2022 by delaying when reporting obligations commence, and requires compliance teams to monitor the effective date of the forthcoming revision to determine the new start date.
13th AFMGM Joint Statement (10 Apr 2026) endorses ASEAN finance-sector frameworks and notes ASW 2.0 / ACTS / AEO MRA milestones
ASEAN’s 13th Finance Ministers’ and Central Bank Governors’ Meeting Joint Statement (adopted 10 April 2026) endorses and flags several ASEAN-wide finance and trade-facilitation deliverables that can become de facto compliance expectations for regulated financial institutions and cross-border trade operators. Items referenced include: endorsement of the ASEAN Finance Sectoral Plan 2026–2030; endorsement of ABIF Guidelines 2.0 (ASEAN Banking Integration Framework); an enhanced Capital Account Liberalisation (CAL) Heat Map template; and sustainable finance governance artifacts under development (a Code of Conduct for External Review Providers and a ‘mitigation co-benefit and Adaptation for Resilience (mARs) Guide’ Version 1 to supplement the ASEAN Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance). The statement also notes operational timelines/milestones relevant to trade compliance and logistics, including progress on the Roadmap for ASEAN Single Window (ASW) 2.0 and the intent to establish legal basis for electronic exchange with external partners, Myanmar joining the ASEAN Customs Transit System (ACTS) and a railway mode pilot targeted by end-2026, and AEO MRA (AAMRA) implementation progress (including an expectation noted for Viet Nam in June 2026). Compliance teams should monitor publication/issuance of these referenced codes/guides/templates and prepare for process and documentation impacts where adopted by member states or used in regional programs.
EPA releases draft TSCA risk evaluation/hazard materials for HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o‑DCB and p‑DCB and announces SACC peer review meeting (June 8–12, 2026)
EPA published draft TSCA risk evaluation documents for HHCB and phthalic anhydride and draft hazard assessment/supporting materials for o-dichlorobenzene and p-dichlorobenzene, and announced a Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review meeting scheduled for June 8–12, 2026 (with a preparatory meeting on May 26, 2026). EPA highlighted that the draft risk evaluation for phthalic anhydride identifies unreasonable risks for certain worker and consumer exposures, which could drive later TSCA Section 6 risk management if finalized. Compliance teams should review draft findings, prepare public comments for the peer review docket, and anticipate potential downstream risk management actions for affected conditions of use.
EPA releases draft TSCA documents for HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene, and p-dichlorobenzene; initiates SACC peer review/public comment process
EPA released draft TSCA risk evaluation and hazard assessment materials for four chemicals (HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene, and p-dichlorobenzene) and announced the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review process, which includes opportunities for public input. While drafts are not binding final determinations, they can materially influence final risk evaluations and potential downstream TSCA §6 risk management actions; compliance teams should review draft findings relevant to their uses and consider participating in the peer review/comment process.
EPA final rule delays start of TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period to Jan 31, 2027 or 60 days after a forthcoming final rule (whichever earlier)
EPA issued a final rule modifying only the start of the submission period for the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS one-time reporting and recordkeeping rule (40 CFR Part 705). The submission period will now start on January 31, 2027, or 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule revising substantive requirements (whichever is earlier). This directly affects compliance planning for entities that manufactured or imported PFAS since Jan 1, 2011 (including PFAS in articles), by shifting when reporting can begin; EPA indicated additional timing details (e.g., duration/end date) may be addressed in a subsequent final action.
US EPA final rule delays start of TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period; adds backstop start date
EPA finalized a rule modifying the start of the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period (40 CFR Part 705). Instead of beginning on April 13, 2026, the submission period will begin on the earlier of (i) January 31, 2027, or (ii) 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule revising the substantive requirements. This changes compliance planning for entities that manufactured or imported PFAS (including PFAS in articles) in any year 2011–2022 by delaying when submissions can/must begin, while also creating a trigger tied to the effective date of a separate forthcoming final action.
ASTM WK86336 opened to revise A193/A193M-23 (remove duplicate/conflicting Grade B8 listing in Table 2)
ASTM has an active standards-development work item (WK86336) proposing a revision to ASTM A193/A193M-23. The rationale described in the work item is to remove a duplicate/conflicting Grade B8 entry in Table 2 (austenitic steels section), where B8 appears twice with different elongation requirements. Although not a government regulation, this is an official ASTM change-in-progress that may affect procurement/specification control and contractual compliance where ASTM A193/A193M-23 is incorporated by reference.
EPA confirms TSCA PFAS reporting window (Apr 13–Oct 13, 2026; small article importers until Apr 13, 2027) on program webpage
EPA’s TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting program page reiterates the one-time reporting submission window for most entities (Apr 13, 2026 through Oct 13, 2026) and the extended deadline for certain small manufacturers reporting solely as PFAS article importers (until Apr 13, 2027). Compliance teams should use the posted window to finalize internal data collection for PFAS manufactured/imported during the rule’s covered period, confirm eligibility for any extended deadline category, and ensure recordkeeping processes align with EPA’s stated requirements.
A proposed bill seeks to extend the deadline for PFAS reporting by manufacturers from January 1, 2026 to July 1, 2027. It also proposes clarification of “currently unavoidable uses” (CUU), which would allow PFAS use in certain essential applications such as medical, aerospace, electronics, and infrastructure. The proposal continues to maintain strict prohibitions on PFAS in selected consumer products (e.g., cosmetics, cookware, textiles) while introducing clearer exemptions for critical industries. Additionally, it outlines a future goal (by 2032) where PFAS would be broadly restricted unless classified as unavoidable.
HF 4257 is a 2026 legislative amendment proposed to delay Minnesota’s PFAS reporting deadline from July 1, 2026, to July 1, 2027, for products manufactured after that date. It aims to clarify "Currently Unavoidable Uses" (CUU) by explicitly exempting essential industries—like semiconductors, electronics, and motor vehicles—from future sales bans. This bill provides manufacturers more time to map complex supply chains while ensuring critical industrial components remain compliant.
EPA launches PFAS OUT initiative to support drinking-water systems’ response to PFAS contamination
EPA announced the PFAS OUT (PFAS OUTreach) initiative to proactively engage public water systems and communities to reduce exposure to PFAS in drinking water and support implementation planning. While not a binding rule change, it is an official programmatic/implementation action that can affect compliance readiness by directing utilities to technical assistance, funding navigation, and implementation resources related to PFAS drinking water standards.
EPA updates PFAS destruction and disposal guidance
EPA issued an update to its PFAS destruction and disposal guidance. This affects how regulated entities and their contractors evaluate and document PFAS waste management approaches (e.g., selection of destruction/disposal technologies and related best practices/considerations). Compliance teams managing PFAS-containing wastes (from treatment residuals, remediation, manufacturing, or product stewardship programs) should review the updated guidance and align waste handling protocols, vendor specifications, and recordkeeping accordingly.
US EPA launches PFAS OUT initiative to support drinking water systems’ PFAS rule implementation
EPA announced the PFAS OUT initiative to proactively engage drinking water systems and provide implementation support (e.g., navigating technical assistance and funding resources) related to PFAS drinking water compliance planning. While not itself changing numeric standards, the initiative signals expanded implementation support activities that may affect utilities’ compliance readiness and coordination with EPA programs.
EPA releases draft CCL 6 for public comment; PFAS included as a contaminant group
EPA announced the release of the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) and indicated that Federal Register publication will open a 60-day public comment period. PFAS are included as a contaminant group in the draft CCL 6, which can influence future monitoring and drinking water regulatory actions under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Compliance teams should monitor the Federal Register notice and prepare to comment, as CCL decisions can drive downstream regulatory obligations.
EPA releases draft Contaminant Candidate List 6 (CCL 6) for public comment, listing PFAS as a contaminant group
EPA announced the release of the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public comment. The draft list includes PFAS as one of the highlighted contaminant groups for evaluation under the Safe Drinking Water Act process. While CCL listing does not itself impose enforceable limits, it is a formal SDWA pipeline step that can drive monitoring/research priorities and can inform future regulatory determinations affecting drinking water compliance planning.
EPA releases draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) including PFAS as a contaminant group; public comment to open upon Federal Register publication
EPA announced the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for drinking water, which includes PFAS as a contaminant group (alongside other contaminant groups). The draft CCL 6 is a pre-regulatory Safe Drinking Water Act step used to prioritize research and potential future regulatory determinations. The announcement indicates a 60-day public comment period will open after Federal Register publication, and EPA expects the final CCL 6 to be signed by Nov. 17, 2026. Compliance teams should consider whether to submit comments (e.g., on PFAS grouping, occurrence data, analytical methods, and prioritization rationale) and monitor downstream impacts on monitoring and future MCL/regulatory determinations.
EPA issues draft CCL 6 for public comment including PFAS as a contaminant group
EPA published a news release announcing the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) and opened a public comment process. The draft list includes PFAS as a contaminant group, which can influence future drinking water regulatory determinations and monitoring priorities. Compliance teams should monitor the CCL 6 process and consider submitting comments, particularly if future SDWA actions could affect PFAS monitoring, treatment obligations, or product stewardship expectations.
EPA releases Draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public comment, including PFAS as a contaminant group
EPA announced release of the Draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public comment. The draft includes PFAS as one of the contaminant groups under consideration. While CCL inclusion does not create enforceable limits, it is a key SDWA prioritization step that can drive additional monitoring/research and future regulatory determinations and rulemaking that may affect water systems and PFAS compliance planning.
HB1811 amendment filed to revise Controlled Substances Act scheduling authority and process (Section 201)
An amendment (ham002) to Illinois HB1811 was filed on 2026-04-02 proposing changes to 720 ILCS 570/201 (Illinois Controlled Substances Act, Section 201). The amendment would adjust the Department’s authority and procedures for adding, deleting, or rescheduling controlled substances (including timelines tied to federal scheduling actions), establish/modify an objection and hearing process, and include provisions referencing security controls/exceptions affecting DEA-registered manufacturers/distributors. Compliance teams should monitor because it could change how and when Illinois scheduling changes are implemented following federal actions, potentially impacting substance control status and facility security expectations.
EPA releases draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) for public comment, including PFAS as a contaminant group
EPA announced the release of the draft Sixth Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 6) under the Safe Drinking Water Act, which includes PFAS as a contaminant group (alongside other contaminant groups). This opens an SDWA pipeline step that can inform future regulatory determinations; compliance teams should monitor the comment process and potential downstream drinking water regulatory actions affecting PFAS.
AICIS varies AIIC listing after CBI revocation and updates Specific Information Requirements for CAS 2097886-94-5
AICIS issued an Inventory variation notice varying the terms of an Australian Inventory of Industrial Chemicals (AIIC) listing after approval to treat the chemical’s proper name as confidential business information (CBI) was revoked (action under Industrial Chemicals Act 2019 s94). AICIS then further varied the listing to add detail to the chemical’s Specific Information Requirements (SIRs) (under s85). The notice identifies the affected chemical by CAS 2097886-94-5. Compliance impact: introducers must follow the updated SIR conditions, including notification obligations (e.g., written notification within 28 calendar days when specified circumstances/secondary-notification-type triggers occur), and ensure internal processes can detect and report trigger events for this listed chemical.