All regulatory updates
894 results found
EPA launches PFAS OUT initiative to support drinking water systems’ PFAS rule implementation
U.S. EPA launched the PFAS OUT initiative to proactively engage public water systems and support implementation of federal PFAS drinking water requirements. EPA indicates it expects to begin contacting systems with PFOA/PFOS results above 4 ppt in summer 2026 and will provide webinars and navigation to funding and technical assistance resources. Compliance teams at water systems and supporting contractors should monitor outreach timing, participate in webinars, and align treatment/monitoring planning with the federal PFAS drinking water rule implementation support being rolled out by EPA.
EPA announces PFAS OUT initiative to support drinking water systems ahead of PFAS NPDWR compliance timelines
EPA announced the PFAS OUTreach (PFAS OUT) initiative to work with communities and public water systems to reduce exposure to PFOA and PFOS in drinking water ahead of federal PFAS drinking water compliance timelines. While not a new binding legal limit, it is an official implementation/support initiative that can affect compliance planning, stakeholder engagement, and readiness activities for systems subject to the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR).
BIS administrative enforcement settlement with Coastal PVA Technology, Inc. for unauthorized exports to Entity List parties
BIS announced an administrative enforcement settlement with Coastal PVA Technology, Inc., reinforcing enforcement expectations under the EAR for transactions involving Entity List parties. The settlement underscores that EAR99 items can still require authorization when exported/reexported/transferred to restricted parties (e.g., Entity List), and highlights due diligence expectations around distributor/reseller transactions and end-user screening, as well as compliance program elements such as procedures, training, and audits that may be required as settlement terms.
EPA finalizes change delaying the start of TSCA PFAS 8(a)(7) reporting period until 60 days after effective date of forthcoming revision
EPA finalized an update to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS data reporting rule timeline, moving the reporting period start from April 13, 2026 to 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming revision to the PFAS 8(a)(7) rule. This affects entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS in any year 2011–2022 by delaying when reporting obligations commence, and requires compliance teams to monitor the effective date of the forthcoming revision to determine the new start date.
US EPA final rule modifies the start of the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period
EPA published a final rule modifying when the submission period begins for the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) one-time PFAS reporting and recordkeeping rule (40 CFR Part 705). The change delays/reties the reporting window start to a future trigger (e.g., tied to the effective date of a forthcoming final rule revising substantive requirements, with a stated backstop date in the Federal Register notice). This affects entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS during the covered lookback period because their compliance planning for data collection and submission timing must be adjusted to the revised start trigger and associated reporting window.
EPA updates TSCA PFAS reporting submission-period start trigger to 60 days after effective date of forthcoming revision (finalized)
EPA finalized a change to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) one-time PFAS reporting timeline by moving the start of the reporting submission period from a fixed date (previously April 13, 2026) to a trigger date: 60 days after the effective date of EPA’s forthcoming revision to the PFAS 8(a)(7) rule. This impacts entities that manufactured or imported PFAS (including PFAS in articles) during the covered period and need to plan reporting readiness around a rule-triggered start rather than a calendar date.
EPA finalizes further delay to TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting period start date (triggered 60 days after effective date of forthcoming revision)
EPA finalized a change to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS one-time reporting rule that moves the start of the reporting period from April 13, 2026 to a new trigger: the reporting period will begin 60 days after the effective date of EPA’s forthcoming revision to the PFAS 8(a)(7) rule. Compliance teams should track the effective date of the forthcoming revision because it will start the 60‑day clock for reporting-period commencement and affects internal data-gathering and submission planning for entities that manufactured/imported PFAS during the covered years.
EPA issues final rule modifying start of TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period (start tied to future rule revision effective date; replaces April 13, 2026 start)
EPA finalized a rule modifying the start of the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) one-time PFAS reporting submission period. The start is no longer a fixed date (previously April 13, 2026) and instead is triggered 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming EPA revision to the TSCA PFAS reporting rule. This affects entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS during the covered lookback period and requires compliance teams to (1) pause reliance on the prior fixed start date, (2) monitor EPA’s forthcoming revision for the new effective date that will trigger the reporting window, and (3) ensure internal data collection systems and supplier outreach can be activated quickly once the trigger date is known.
EPA issues final rule modifying start of TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period (60-day trigger; Jan 31, 2027 backstop)
EPA finalized a rule modifying the start of the submission period for TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting (40 CFR part 705). The submission period will begin on January 31, 2027, or 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule that will make substantive revisions to the PFAS reporting rule—whichever is earlier. This changes the prior planned April 13, 2026 start and affects entities that manufactured or imported PFAS during the covered lookback period by shifting compliance planning to the new trigger/backstop dates and requiring monitoring of the forthcoming final revision that starts the 60-day clock.
EPA extends TSCA PFAS §8(a)(7) reporting submission start trigger to 60 days after effective date of forthcoming revision (final rule)
EPA finalized a change to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting rule that moves the start of the submission period from a fixed April 13, 2026 date to a dynamic trigger: 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule revising the TSCA PFAS reporting regulation. This affects entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS (as defined in the rule) during 2011–2022 and requires compliance teams to monitor EPA’s forthcoming revision effective date because that date will start the reporting window clock.
US EPA updates TSCA PFAS §8(a)(7) reporting submission-period start trigger (effective after forthcoming revision; includes backstop date)
EPA issued a final rule modifying the start of the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS one-time reporting submission period (40 CFR Part 705). As described in EPA materials, the prior fixed start date (April 13, 2026) is replaced with a trigger tied to a forthcoming revision to the PFAS 8(a)(7) rule, with a backstop date referenced in EPA’s pre-publication final rule materials. This changes when regulated entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS during the covered lookback period must begin submitting required data and may affect internal compliance planning, supplier data collection, and system readiness.
EPA releases draft TSCA documents for HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene, and p-dichlorobenzene; initiates SACC peer review/public comment process
EPA released draft TSCA risk evaluation and hazard assessment materials for four chemicals (HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene, and p-dichlorobenzene) and announced the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review process, which includes opportunities for public input. While drafts are not binding final determinations, they can materially influence final risk evaluations and potential downstream TSCA §6 risk management actions; compliance teams should review draft findings relevant to their uses and consider participating in the peer review/comment process.
Draft OESG Scientific Report for first effectiveness evaluation published for review; comments due 8 June 2026
The Minamata Convention Open-Ended Scientific Group (OESG) released a draft scientific report (dated 10 April 2026) supporting the Convention’s first effectiveness evaluation process and opened an eight-week period for Parties to provide input. The draft report and the Secretariat news item specify a comment deadline of 8 June 2026. While not a binding legal change, it is an actionable consultation milestone for Parties and technical stakeholders supporting national positions and future COP decisions tied to effectiveness evaluation under the Convention.
EPA releases draft TSCA risk evaluation materials for HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene, and p-dichlorobenzene; SACC peer review meetings scheduled
EPA released draft TSCA risk evaluation and/or hazard assessment materials for HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB), and p-dichlorobenzene (p-DCB), and announced TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review meeting dates (including a preparatory meeting on May 26, 2026 and a peer review meeting on June 8–12, 2026). Stakeholders should review the drafts and participate in the SACC/public docket process because draft conclusions (e.g., preliminary unreasonable-risk findings for certain chemicals/uses described by EPA) may inform subsequent TSCA Section 6 risk management actions.
EPA releases draft TSCA risk evaluation/hazard materials for HHCB, phthalic anhydride, o‑DCB and p‑DCB and announces SACC peer review meeting (June 8–12, 2026)
EPA published draft TSCA risk evaluation documents for HHCB and phthalic anhydride and draft hazard assessment/supporting materials for o-dichlorobenzene and p-dichlorobenzene, and announced a Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review meeting scheduled for June 8–12, 2026 (with a preparatory meeting on May 26, 2026). EPA highlighted that the draft risk evaluation for phthalic anhydride identifies unreasonable risks for certain worker and consumer exposures, which could drive later TSCA Section 6 risk management if finalized. Compliance teams should review draft findings, prepare public comments for the peer review docket, and anticipate potential downstream risk management actions for affected conditions of use.
EPA final rule delays start of TSCA PFAS one-time reporting submission period; ties start to future final revisions with Jan 31, 2027 backstop
EPA finalized a change to the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting timeline: the start of the submission period is no longer a fixed April 13, 2026 date. Instead, the reporting window will begin 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule revising the PFAS reporting regulation, with a backstop start date of January 31, 2027 (whichever is earlier, as described in the signed pre-publication final rule). This affects entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS during the 2011–2022 lookback period (including certain article importers), requiring compliance teams to re-baseline project plans for data collection, supplier outreach, and internal system readiness against the new trigger-based start date.
EPA finalizes change to TSCA PFAS reporting submission-period start (moved from April 13, 2026 to trigger tied to future rule revision)
EPA finalized an update to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) one-time PFAS reporting rule changing when the submission period starts. Instead of beginning April 13, 2026, the start is moved to a date tied to a forthcoming final rule revising the PFAS reporting regulation (start is triggered 60 days after that revision’s effective date). This affects compliance planning for entities that manufactured (including imported) PFAS during 2011–2022, including preparation of data systems, supplier outreach, and internal record collection timelines.
EPA publishes update page confirming TSCA PFAS §8(a)(7) reporting submission-period start trigger changed (60 days after effective date of forthcoming final rule; Jan 31, 2027 backstop)
EPA updated its official webpage to reflect the final change to the start of the one-time TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting submission period. The start is no longer tied to the previously planned April 13, 2026 opening; instead, the submission period begins 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule revising the reporting requirements, with a backstop date of January 31, 2027. Compliance teams that were preparing for an April 2026 reporting window should adjust internal data-collection, supplier outreach, and IT submission planning to the revised trigger and monitor for the forthcoming final rule that will start the 60‑day clock.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has extended the reporting deadlines for the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule, providing additional time for manufacturers and importers to submit required PFAS-related information
The updated reporting timeline extends the deadline for most manufacturers and importers to January 31, 2027. Small businesses importing PFAS-containing articles will receive an additional extension until April 13, 2027.
BIS final rule extends triggering date and application deadline for authorized/approved IC designer status under ECCN 3A090.a Note 1 to December 31, 2026
BIS published a final rule (15 CFR part 774) titled "Extension of Authorized Integrated Circuit (IC) Designer Status and Application Deadline To Become an Approved IC Designer" extending the date tied to "authorized integrated circuit designer" status and the deadline for submitting applications to become an approved IC designer under Note 1 to ECCN 3A090.a. The rule extends the relevant triggering/application date to December 31, 2026 (replacing a prior April 2026 date referenced in the rule). This affects exporters, reexporters, and transferors involved in advanced computing/logic IC supply chains who rely on the approved/authorized IC designer pathways associated with ECCN 3A090 controls; compliance teams should update internal calendars, application planning, and customer/supplier qualification workflows accordingly.