EPA signed and announced a proposed rule to amend the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping requirements (40 CFR Part 705). The proposal would add several exemptions (including imported articles and a de minimis 0.1% concept) and make other practical/technical changes intended to reduce burden while maintaining access to safety data. Compliance teams subject to PFAS reporting should assess whether their operations would fall in/out of scope if finalized and consider submitting comments through the rulemaking docket during the comment period described by EPA (stated as 45 days after Federal Register publication in the research text).
EPA issued a proposed rule to revise the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS one-time reporting and recordkeeping rule (40 CFR Part 705). The proposal would add/clarify exemptions (including a de minimis concept referenced in the research, and exemptions related to imported articles, byproducts, impurities, R&D, and non-isolated intermediates), make technical corrections, and adjust reporting mechanics/submission period. Compliance teams tracking PFAS data obligations should review applicability changes and prepare comments during the open comment period once published in the Federal Register.
EPA issued a proposed rule (prepublication document signed Nov 10, 2025) to revise the TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS data reporting and recordkeeping requirements (one-time reporting covering PFAS manufactured/imported during 2011–2022). The proposal would make reporting more practical by introducing/clarifying multiple exemptions and scope limitations (including imported articles and a de minimis threshold of ≤0.1% in mixtures/products, plus exemptions for certain byproducts, impurities, R&D, and non-isolated intermediates), along with technical corrections and adjustments to the submission period. EPA indicated a public comment period of 45 days upon Federal Register publication. Compliance teams should evaluate whether their PFAS-related activities could become exempt (e.g., article importers) and track the final rule and any changes to submission timing and data elements.
EPA finalized an extension of certain compliance dates in the TSCA §6 methylene chloride risk management rule for non-federal industrial/commercial laboratories, including Workplace Chemical Protection Program (WCPP) elements (e.g., monitoring, regulated areas/ECEL compliance, and related plans/controls) and associated recordkeeping. This changes when covered laboratories must meet specific WCPP obligations, affecting internal implementation timelines, SOP updates, and contractor/lab compliance planning.
EPA issued a final rule (pre-publication copy signed Nov. 7, 2025) extending certain compliance dates for the methylene chloride TSCA Section 6 risk management rule as it applies to industrial/commercial laboratories (non-federal). The pre-publication notice describes an 18-month extension for multiple Workplace Chemical Protection Program (WCPP) and recordkeeping deadlines (e.g., initial monitoring, regulated areas/ECEL compliance, exposure limits methods/exposure control plan). Compliance teams in labs using methylene chloride should update implementation plans, internal deadlines, and contractor/worker protection procedures to reflect the extended dates once confirmed in the Federal Register publication.
EPA signed a final rule (pre-publication copy) extending certain Workplace Chemical Protection Program (WCPP) and related recordkeeping compliance dates for industrial/commercial laboratories that are not federally owned/operated under the TSCA section 6 methylene chloride rule. The research summary lists specific date extensions for initial monitoring, regulated areas/ECEL compliance, and exposure controls/exposure control plan milestones. Compliance teams at affected laboratories should update implementation plans, monitoring schedules, and documentation systems to align with the extended deadlines.
EPA finalized a set of Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) (batch 24-4.5e) covering certain chemical substances/new uses. SNURs require submitters to file a Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) before engaging in designated significant new uses, affecting manufacturing/import and downstream use planning. Compliance teams should identify whether any substances in their portfolios fall within the batch and ensure SNUN and supply-chain communication processes are in place before any covered new uses occur.
EPA’s New Chemicals Program updates reflect multiple Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) actions under TSCA Section 5 affecting substances that were subject to PMNs/TSCA orders. EPA published a final SNUR batch (“24-4.5e”) in the Federal Register on Nov. 4, 2025, with an effective date of Jan. 5, 2026, creating Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) notification triggers for the covered substances/uses. EPA also published several proposed SNUR batches (Nov. 3, 2025) and proposed amendments to existing SNURs (Oct. 28, 2025), each with associated public comment periods via Regulations.gov dockets. Compliance teams should review whether any substances in their portfolios are covered by the final SNUR effective Jan. 5, 2026 and monitor/participate in proposed SNUR actions that could add or modify SNUN obligations.
EPA finalized a batch of Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) under TSCA Section 5, establishing significant new uses that trigger Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) obligations before manufacture, import, or processing for those uses can begin. This is a binding regulatory change for entities handling covered substances, requiring screening of uses against the SNUR conditions and updating internal new-use change-management to ensure SNUN submissions occur before initiating any designated significant new use. The research notes the final SNUR batch was published Nov. 4, 2025 and became effective Jan. 5, 2026.
EPA proposed several batches of Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) (24-5.5e, 25-1.5e, 25-2.5e). If finalized, these SNURs would require submission of a SNUN before certain new uses can proceed. Stakeholders had an opportunity to comment (deadline stated as Dec. 3, 2025) and should track finalization outcomes for implications on commercialization, import, and downstream use conditions.
EPA proposed multiple SNUR batches (published Nov. 3, 2025) and proposed amendments to existing SNURs (published Oct. 28, 2025). If finalized, these proposals would impose or modify TSCA Section 5 Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) requirements for specified chemical substances/uses. Compliance teams should monitor the relevant dockets, evaluate whether their substances/uses could be affected, and consider submitting comments as appropriate.
EPA proposed amendments/modifications to existing SNUR requirements (batch 23-1.M). The proposal would adjust significant new use designations for covered substances and opened a public comment period (deadline stated as Nov. 28, 2025). Companies should review whether amended SNUR triggers could affect current or planned uses and consider submitting comments and preparing for potential final changes.
EPA proposed amendments to the TSCA risk evaluation procedures rule (the ‘Framework Rule’) that governs how EPA conducts existing-chemical risk evaluations. The proposal (per EPA’s release) would adjust key procedural elements such as conditions-of-use determinations and other evaluation process components, and opens a public comment period. Compliance teams should assess how the proposed procedural changes could affect the scope, pace, and content of future TSCA risk evaluations relevant to their chemical portfolios and consider submitting comments.
EPA issued a proposed rule to amend procedures for conducting chemical risk evaluations for existing chemicals under TSCA. This proposal would revise the risk evaluation framework and could affect how companies plan for risk evaluation scope, data submissions, use categorization, and downstream risk management implications. Compliance teams should review the proposal and consider participating in the public comment process for impacts to ongoing and future TSCA risk evaluations.
EPA announced a proposed rule to revise the process/procedures for conducting TSCA risk evaluations for chemicals already in commerce (existing chemicals), intended to increase efficiency and better protect health and the environment. The proposal opens a public comment period (duration described by EPA in the news release). Compliance teams should assess how potential changes could affect scope, pace, and data expectations for TSCA risk evaluations, and consider submitting comments via the associated docket if affected.
EPA announced availability of the latest update to the public (non-confidential) TSCA Inventory as part of its biannual posting cycle, including updates to inventory totals and associated data elements (e.g., commercial activity, unique identifier data, regulatory flags). EPA also notes the next regular update is planned for winter 2026. Compliance teams should refresh internal inventory reference datasets and re-check substance listing status and applicable flags used to support TSCA Inventory determinations.
EPA issued an interim final rule that delays the TSCA §8(a)(7) one-time PFAS reporting submission period. The submission window start moved from July 11, 2025 to April 13, 2026. EPA states most reporters must submit by Oct. 13, 2026, while small manufacturers reporting exclusively as PFAS article importers have until Apr. 13, 2027. Compliance teams should adjust internal data-collection and supplier engagement timelines for the 2011–2022 PFAS manufacture/import lookback accordingly.
EPA’s TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting program page describes the current reporting window and extended submission deadlines established via an interim final rule. Per the research text, submissions are due by Oct 13, 2026 for most manufacturers (including importers), and by Apr 13, 2027 for small manufacturers that only need to report PFAS in imported articles. Companies in scope should align data collection and internal reporting systems to the updated reporting window and submission deadlines and monitor ongoing rulemaking that could further alter scope.
EPA announced availability of the latest update to the non-confidential TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (Update #7). Inventory updates support determinations of whether a substance is listed as an existing chemical and provide updated activity status and regulatory flags used for compliance screening. Companies should refresh internal Inventory datasets and screening tools used for TSCA Section 5 and import/manufacture compliance checks.
EPA finalized amendments to the TSCA new chemicals regulations governing EPA’s review of Premanufacture Notices (PMNs) and Significant New Use Notices (SNUNs). The research summary highlights changes that (a) make PFAS and other PBT chemicals ineligible for certain exemptions (e.g., Low Volume Exemption (LVE) / LoREX) and (b) require EPA to make one of the statutory determinations before manufacture/processing may begin. Compliance teams should review impacts on new chemical submissions, exemption strategies, and any PFAS/PBT-related R&D/manufacturing plans, and update internal submission workflows accordingly.