EPA is seeking public input to develop a durable TSCA regulation for legacy uses and associated disposals of asbestos (Part 2 risk management rule). TSCA section 6(c)(1)(C) authorizes EPA to adjust the proposed rule deadline when additional information is necessary. EPA finalized the asbestos Part 2 risk evaluation in December 2024. The agency requests information on activities that disturb asbestos-containing materials, use of legacy products, and air-sampling methods.
EPA is advancing its TSCA review of five chemicals by releasing draft technical support documents for peer review and public comment. The chemicals are: 1,1,2-trichloroethane, TBBPA (tetrabromobisphenol A), 1,2-dichloropropane, and two additional chemicals. These documents support ongoing risk evaluations under TSCA Section 6. Manufacturers, processors, and other stakeholders should review and provide input during the peer review and comment period.
EPA published a notice of availability and request for comment on the TBBPA (4,4′-(1-Methylethylidene)bis[2,6-dibromophenol], CASRN 1163-19-5) risk evaluation under TSCA Section 6. TBBPA is a brominated flame retardant used in electronics, plastics, and other applications. The comment period ends August 17, 2026. Stakeholders should submit comments on the draft risk evaluation to inform EPA's final determination.
The EPA has proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) under TSCA Section 5 for chemical substances that were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs) and TSCA Orders. The SNURs would require persons intending to manufacture or process these chemical substances for activities designated as significant new uses to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. This is Batch 26-1 of proposed SNURs.
EPA announced it will move forward with TSCA section 6(a) risk management to regulate 15 industrial and commercial conditions of use of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2‑DCA), based on EPA’s final risk evaluation finding unreasonable risk to workers in 15 of 20 conditions of use (driven by inhalation and dermal exposure). EPA stated it did not identify unreasonable risk to consumers, the general population (including fish-consuming/Tribal communities), or the environment under evaluated conditions of use. Compliance teams should anticipate forthcoming workplace-focused restrictions/controls for affected 1,2‑DCA uses and monitor the referenced docket activity for proposed requirements, timelines, and any exemptions.
EPA published a rolling public list of TSCA Confidential Business Information (CBI) claims scheduled to expire (including claims expiring between June 22, 2026 and July 31, 2026) and stated it will refresh the list monthly. EPA also described a new electronic extension-request process in EPA’s Central Data Exchange (CDX) using a dedicated tool (TSCA Section 14(e) CBI Claim Extension Request). Companies must submit extension requests with substantiation no later than 30 days before claim expiration to maintain confidentiality protections; otherwise, EPA may no longer be required to protect the information from disclosure. Compliance teams should inventory TSCA submissions with CBI claims, monitor the monthly expiring-claims list, and prepare CDX extension filings within EPA’s stated timing window.
EPA announced important policy updates to the TSCA New Chemicals Program. Key changes include: EPA will no longer issue 'not likely to present unreasonable risk' determinations based on proposed SNURs; worker protections will be mandated through TSCA Section 5(e) orders rather than relying on OSHA standards; and EPA will identify absence of worker safeguards as 'reasonably foreseen' conditions of use. EPA remains committed to meeting statutory deadlines for review and determinations on new chemicals submissions.
EPA announced a final rule on May 22, 2026 extending the TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data reporting deadline to May 21, 2027 for all 16 chemicals covered under the rule. Manufacturers (including importers) of these 16 chemicals must report data from unpublished health and safety studies to EPA by the new deadline.
EPA announced a proposed rulemaking to extend certain compliance dates in the final TSCA §6 risk management rules for perchloroethylene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC). EPA stated existing compliance dates remain in effect unless and until revised through rulemaking, but EPA intends to focus compliance/enforcement resources on the new compliance dates that would be established if the proposal is finalized. Compliance teams using or supplying PCE/CTC should track the proposal and be prepared to re-baseline internal Workplace Chemical Protection Program timelines and related operational controls once new dates are finalized.
EPA published draft TSCA risk evaluation materials: draft risk evaluations for HHCB and phthalic anhydride and draft hazard assessments/supporting documents for o-dichlorobenzene and p-dichlorobenzene. EPA also announced Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review meetings (including a preparatory meeting) as part of the TSCA risk evaluation process. Compliance teams should review the drafts, consider submitting comments to the peer review docket, and assess whether conditions of use identified as presenting unreasonable risk could lead to future TSCA §6 risk management requirements if finalized.
EPA extended the public comment period for the proposed TSCA Section 5 Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) titled “Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances (26-2).” The comment deadline is extended to July 10, 2026. This affects stakeholders planning to submit comments on the proposed SNURs and provides additional time to evaluate potential impacts on manufacturing (including import) or processing of substances subject to TSCA orders and SNUR-based notice requirements (SNUNs) prior to designated significant new uses.
EPA proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) for chemical substances subject to premanufacture notices (PMNs) P-25-73, P-25-152, P-25-137, and P-25-151. The SNURs require 90-day notification (SNUN) to EPA before manufacturing or processing for significant new uses. EPA identified concerns for carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, specific target organ toxicity, and dermal/respiratory sensitization. Estimated cost per SNUN submission is $45,496.
EPA issued a proposed rule to add Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) for certain chemical substances subject to TSCA consent orders. The proposal would require companies to submit a Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) at least 90 days before manufacturing or processing for a designated significant new use. Compliance teams should identify whether any affected substances are in their portfolios and consider commenting by the deadline; if finalized, SNUN planning/lead times and use restrictions may affect R&D, scale-up, importing, and downstream customer applications.
EPA published a proposed rule to establish Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) for certain chemical substances (SNUR batch 26-2). If finalized, manufacturers and processors would be required to submit a Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) at least 90 days before commencing any activity designated as a significant new use (generally, activities not consistent with protective measures in underlying TSCA §5 orders). Compliance teams should determine whether any portfolio substances or planned uses could be affected and consider submitting comments by the stated deadline.
EPA announced a proposal to extend certain compliance dates in the final TSCA Section 6 risk management rules for perchloroethylene (PCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CTC) while EPA works to revise these rules. Compliance teams should note EPA’s statement that existing deadlines remain in effect unless/until changed through rulemaking; organizations subject to the PCE/CTC prohibitions and related downstream requirements should monitor the forthcoming Federal Register publication and comment period details referenced by EPA and prepare for potential updated phase-in timelines if the proposal is finalized.
EPA published final Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) under TSCA Section 5 for a set of chemical substances (SNUR batch “26-2”). Companies that manufacture, import, or process any of the covered substances must evaluate whether their activities constitute a “significant new use” and, if so, submit a Significant New Use Notice (SNUN) before commencing that use. Compliance teams should identify whether any covered substances appear in products, intermediates, or R&D pipelines and update new-chemical/SNUR screening processes accordingly.
EPA finalized a change to the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) one-time PFAS reporting timeline by moving the start of the reporting submission period from a fixed date (previously April 13, 2026) to a trigger date: 60 days after the effective date of EPA’s forthcoming revision to the PFAS 8(a)(7) rule. This impacts entities that manufactured or imported PFAS (including PFAS in articles) during the covered period and need to plan reporting readiness around a rule-triggered start rather than a calendar date.
EPA finalized a rule modifying the start of the submission period for TSCA §8(a)(7) PFAS reporting (40 CFR part 705). The submission period will begin on January 31, 2027, or 60 days after the effective date of a forthcoming final rule that will make substantive revisions to the PFAS reporting rule—whichever is earlier. This changes the prior planned April 13, 2026 start and affects entities that manufactured or imported PFAS during the covered lookback period by shifting compliance planning to the new trigger/backstop dates and requiring monitoring of the forthcoming final revision that starts the 60-day clock.
EPA released draft risk evaluation documents for HHCB (fragrance ingredient), phthalic anhydride, o-dichlorobenzene (oDCB), and p-dichlorobenzene (pDCB). The agency is convening a peer review meeting of the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) and soliciting public comments. HHCB draft finding shows no unreasonable risk across 22 conditions of use; phthalic anhydride shows unreasonable risk to workers in 36 conditions and consumers in 2 conditions from dermal/inhalation exposure.
EPA published draft TSCA risk evaluation documents for HHCB and phthalic anhydride and draft hazard assessment/supporting materials for o-dichlorobenzene and p-dichlorobenzene, and announced a Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) peer review meeting scheduled for June 8–12, 2026 (with a preparatory meeting on May 26, 2026). EPA highlighted that the draft risk evaluation for phthalic anhydride identifies unreasonable risks for certain worker and consumer exposures, which could drive later TSCA Section 6 risk management if finalized. Compliance teams should review draft findings, prepare public comments for the peer review docket, and anticipate potential downstream risk management actions for affected conditions of use.